AI tools I actually use

A short, opinionated list of the AI tools I reach for, what each one is good at, and where the lines are between them. None of this is sponsored. The tools that earn a place here are the ones I have used long enough to have an honest opinion about.

Updated April 2026
My core three

Claude

Paid plan, free tier
For document work, coding, workflow integration and automation

Claude is the model I trust with anything that needs careful, structured output. Long documents, code, agentic workflows, anything where instructions need to be followed precisely and the output needs to hold together over many steps. The reasoning is patient and the tone is calm, which makes it a good thinking partner when I am working through a problem rather than just looking up an answer. This website was built with Claude.

claude.ai →

Gemini

Paid plan, free tier
For text treatment and double checking strategic thinking

Gemini is excellent at refining prose and at stress testing an argument. When I have written something and want a second pair of eyes, or when I have a strategic line of reasoning that I want pressure tested before I commit to it, Gemini is who I go to. Its connection to Google search also makes it useful when the question depends on something current.

gemini.google.com →

ChatGPT

Paid plan, free tier
The workhorse for everyday personal questions

ChatGPT is what I use for the lighter end of life. Recipes, trivia, quick how-to questions, suggestions for what to bring to a dinner. The output is shorter and more conversational, which is what I want for casual asks. I rarely use it for work, but it earns its keep at home.

chatgpt.com →
Free tools worth knowing

STORM

Free
Academic and long form research

An open project from Stanford that produces Wikipedia-style articles on a topic of your choice, complete with citations. It is genuinely useful when you are starting a research project and want a structured map of the terrain before diving into individual sources. Free to use, no account required for the hosted version.

storm.genie.stanford.edu →

NotebookLM

Free
Working with your own documents

Google's research notebook. You upload PDFs, slides, transcripts, or links, and it lets you ask questions grounded in those sources, with citations back to the exact passage. The audio overview feature, which generates a podcast-style discussion of your material, is surprisingly good for absorbing dense documents on a walk.

notebooklm.google.com →

Perplexity

Free, paid for power use
Search with citations

Where I go when I want a sourced answer rather than a generated one. Every claim links back to the page it came from, which is exactly what you want when you are about to cite something. The free tier is generous enough for most occasional use.

perplexity.ai →

Mistral Le Chat

Free
A capable EU-based alternative

French-built, hosted in Europe, and free at the level most people will ever need. Worth knowing about if you have any preference for keeping data on this side of the Atlantic, or simply want a backup that is not from one of the three big American labs.

chat.mistral.ai →

Elicit

Free, paid for heavy use
Searching academic literature

Built specifically for finding and summarising peer-reviewed research. Drop in a question and it returns relevant papers with structured summaries of the methodology and findings. A good first stop when you want to know what the academic consensus actually says about something.

elicit.com →
The lines between these tools shift constantly. A model that is excellent for one thing today may be average in three months, and a tool that is below the bar today may be the leader by next quarter. The right approach is to keep two or three open, send the same question to each every so often, and let your own taste tell you which one to keep.